C-MOVE vs C-GET

Suggestions for MicroDicom viewer
Post Reply
maaak
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2021 12:47 pm

C-MOVE vs C-GET

Post by maaak »

Good day
I am having orthanc as my PACS servers, but when I add my server to microdicom and use C-get, it takes long time to download study and the study is being donwnloaded image by image, however if I use C-Move the study is being downloaded very fast and more then one image is being donwloaded at once? , is it the way that C-MOVE and C-GET protocol act or is it only in microdicom? and is there away to make C-GET do like C-MOVE faster and downloading more then image at once.


Thank you for the good work
microdicom
Site Admin
Posts: 369
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Location: Bulgaria
Contact:

Re: C-MOVE vs C-GET

Post by microdicom »

Could you explain me in more details what you mean downloading image by image for C-GET?
maaak
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2021 12:47 pm

Re: C-MOVE vs C-GET

Post by maaak »

I mean if I put C-GET it takes more then 2 minutes to open the study from the server, while with C-Move protocol the whole study open faster in less then 15 seconds
Attachments
c-move.png
c-move.png (14.22 KiB) Viewed 222 times
c-get.png
c-get.png (57.6 KiB) Viewed 222 times
microdicom
Site Admin
Posts: 369
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 2:00 am
Location: Bulgaria
Contact:

Re: C-MOVE vs C-GET

Post by microdicom »

We tested it with our local Orthanc server and we don't see the difference in speed with C-MOVE and C-GET.
Is it possible to make a test with your Orthanc server?
maaak
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2021 12:47 pm

Re: C-MOVE vs C-GET

Post by maaak »

Thank you I retested and it is working fine it seems to be the problem with transfer speed on my network
Post Reply